top of page

Updated: Apr 4

Technical Review Article | Open Access | Published 2nd of April 2025

Proniosomes: A review on provesicular drug delivery system


Jayashree B. Gaja,¹ Dr. Panner Selvam R²

Abstract 

Proniosomes are a novel provesicular system used for delivering hydrophobic as well as hydrophilic drugs. They are non-ionic surfactant vesicles that, upon hydration, form niosomes. The incorporation of the drug within the vesicular structure of the proniosomes improves its bioavailability, extending its duration in systemic circulation. Proniosomes are a better alternative to the other vesicular systems due to their superior physicochemical stability and effective drug delivery capability. Proniosomes represent promising drug delivery technologies for delivering the drug through various routes. This review describes structural components and their effect on proniosomes vesicle formation and application of proniosomes in drug delivery.


Keywords: proniosomes, drug carrier, provesicular, drug delivery, non-ionic surfactant


Introduction


Vesicular drug delivery systems are used as drug carriers where both lipophilic as well as lipophobic drugs can be encapsulated in amphiphilic vesicles. This encapsulation of drugs in vesicles can prevent drug degradation as well as prolong the drug residence time in the systemic circulation.  It includes liposomes, niosomes, ethosomes, transfersomes, pharmacosomes, proliposomes and proniosomes etc. Among these, proniosomes is one of the provesicular approaches gaining popularity¹,².


 These are vesicular structures with non-ionic surfactants as a main component, present in free-flowing powder or semi-solid gel form ³,⁴. Hydration of proniosomes leads to formation of niosomes ⁵. These have been successfully employed for drug delivery through various administration routes such as oral, transdermal, ocular, intranasal, parenteral, pulmonary etc.⁵⁻¹⁰.


Proniosomal formulation offers prolonged drug release, which reduces the need for frequent dose administration and improves patient compliance. Targeted administration of proniosomes to particular organs or tissues increases therapeutic efficacy while lowering systemic toxicity ¹¹.


Based on method of preparation, proniosomes are classified as dry granular form and liquid crystalline or gel form. Dry granular proniosomes are water-soluble carrier particles such as maltodextrin, sorbitol, mannitol etc. which are coated with nonionic surfactant and can be hydrated to produce niosomes. Whereas liquid crystalline proniosomes/proniosomal gel possess a highly organized liquid crystalline structure, which enhances the drug permeation through the biological membranes ¹².


Composition of proniosomes

The essential and common components of the proniosomal drug delivery system are as follows:


Nonionic Surfactant

Nonionic surfactants are the important structural component in the preparation of proniosomes. These molecules are more stable, compatible and less toxic compared to cationic and anionic surfactant types¹³. Apart from vesicle formation, nonionic surfactants help in controlled drug release, play a part as penetration enhancers in transdermal medication and can be used to improve the bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs in oral proniosomal formulation¹⁴. Vesicle formation and entrapment efficiency depend on various parameters like Hydrophilic Lipophilic Balance (HLB) value, chemical nature, phase transition temperature, chain length and the size of the hydrophilic group of the surfactant. Surfactants with longer alkyl chains and lower HLB values (between 4-8) were found to have high encapsulation efficiency whereas surfactants with high HLB values having large polar head groups cannot form vesicles. Phase Transition temperature (Tc) increases as the length of the alkyl chain increases providing the highest entrapment for the drug¹⁵⁻¹⁸. 


The most common nonionic surfactants used for vesicle formation are alkyl ethers, alkyl esters and esters of fatty acids as given below.


Sorbitan fatty acid esters

Sorbitan fatty acid esters are usually referred to as Spans. The polar head groups are similar in all Spans, while the alkyl hydrocarbon chains are varied. Spans surfactants with different fatty acid chain lengths like Span 20, Span 40, Span 60, Span 80 have been used alone or in combination in preparation of proniosomes. Spans with lower HLB values and increased alkyl chain length exhibit high entrapment efficiency¹⁹. Span 60 showed higher entrapment efficiency than the other spans²¹.


Figure 1. Chemical structure of sorbitan fatty acid esters
Figure 1. Chemical structure of sorbitan fatty acid esters

Polyoxyethylene fatty acid esters 

Tweens, commonly referred to as polysorbates, are polyoxyethylene sorbitan esters. Tween 20 and Tween 60, Tween 80 have been used in proniosomal formulation. However, Tween 80 being a hydrophilic surfactant with a high HLB value elucidates the lower entrapment efficiency in proniosomal formulations²².  However, a few articles reported that the drug entrapment efficiency of Tween is superior compared to different Spans containing proniosomes²³,²⁴.


Sugar esters

These are non-ionic surfactants with sucrose as the polar head group and fatty acids as non-polar groups.  Different grades of sugar esters, such as sucrose stearate S-1670, S-970, S-370, sucrose palmitate P-1670, sucrose myristate, M-1695, and sucrose laurate L-1695 have been used as permeation and absorption enhancers.  These have excellent safety profiles and are non-irritants²⁵.


Cremophor 

Cremophor is hydrogenated castor oil. Cremophor has been successfully used in proniosomal gel formulation as a permeation enhancer. The use of cremophor provided proniosomes with favourable physicochemical characteristics and a sustained release pattern suitable for ocular delivery²⁶⁻²⁷.

Figure 2. Chemical structure of Cremophor RH-40
Figure 2. Chemical structure of Cremophor RH-40

Poloxamer

Poloxamer is a polyethylene-propylene glycol copolymer nonionic surfactant that acts as a penetration enhancer by removing the mucus layer and breaking junctional complexes and thus improving the solubility of drug²⁸⁻²⁹.

Figure 3. Chemical structure of poloxamer 188
Figure 3. Chemical structure of poloxamer 188

Polyoxyethylene alkyl ether

Polyoxyethylene alkyl ethers, such as Brij-35, Brij 72, Brij 78 Brij 92, are nonionic surfactants used as good vesicle forming nonionic surfactants in the proniosomes formulation. Proniosomal gel prepared using Brij 35 showed better entrapment and the highest in vitro drug release with an equimolar ratio (1:1) of Brij 35 and cholesterol³⁰. Proniosomal gel containing Brij 72, Brij 92 having long alkyl chain and lower HLB values showed better vesicle forming ability and higher entrapment efficiency (EE) of the drug within the hydrophobic core³¹.


Table 1. Common nonionic surfactants used in proniosomal formulations
Table 1. Common nonionic surfactants used in proniosomal formulations

Cholesterol

Although, non-ionic surfactants represent the essential component of proniosomal vesicles, the incorporation of cholesterol influences stability and permeability in the vesicle.  Cholesterol makes the membrane more ordered by interaction with surfactants through hydrogen bonding and hence able to effectively prevent leakage of drugs from bilayer vesicles. Cholesterol provides rigidity to the bilayer and enhances the entrapment efficiency of proniosomes. The increased drug entrapment is most likely due to increased vesicle size and increased width of lipid bilayer which increase the vesicle volume and entrapment efficiency²¹,³². 


The concentration of cholesterol in the formulation depends on the HLB value of the surfactants. Surfactants with high HLB values such as Brij 35, Brij 92, Tween 80 and Pluronic F68 will need higher concentration of cholesterol to form vesicles. On the other hand, proniosomes can be produced even at low cholesterol concentration in case of surfactants with low HLB value such as Brij 72, Span 65³³.


Lecithin


Lecithin is a phospholipid that acts as a membrane stabilizer and penetration enhancer in proniosomes formulations. It forms a tightly packed bilayer, decreases membrane permeability and prevents drug leakage, thus improving the drug entrapment of the vesicles. Soya lecithin is derived from soybean, while egg lecithin obtained from egg yolk, is most commonly utilized in proniosomal formulations. Soya lecithin is a good penetration enhancer compared to egg lecithin, due to the presence of unsaturated fatty acids in soya lecithin, whereas egg lecithin contains saturated fatty acids¹⁹,³⁴,³⁵.


Solvent

Solvents like ethanol, isopropyl alcohol, butanol, propanol have been employed in the preparation of proniosomes. Alcohol acts as penetration enhancer 36. The rate of drug penetration and vesicle size are affected by the different alcohols. The rate of permeation increases with the longer chain length of the alcohol. Maximum drug permeation was observed with isopropanol, possibly due to branched chain structure. Vesicles formed from different alcohols differ in size. Vesicles with ethanol result in the highest size while isopropanol results in vesicles of the smallest size, which may be due to branched chains present in it³⁷⁻³⁹.


Carrier

Dry Granular Proniosomes are prepared using carriers that are coated with suitable noisome-forming surfactants. The carrier should be non-toxic, water soluble but poorly soluble in the solvent used in the formulation. Commonly used carriers include maltodextrin, sorbitol and mannitol and to a lesser extent magnesium aluminium silicate, spray dried lactose and sucrose stearates are used⁴⁰,⁴¹.


Hydration medium

Formation of niosomes from proniosomes is carried out by the addition of a suitable hydration medium such as water, phosphate buffer saline. Hydration media affect the vesicle size and entrapment efficiency of the proniosomes⁴²,⁴³.


Charge inducer

The addition of charge inducers affects the drug encapsulation efficiency and vesicle size. Stearyl amine and dicetyl phosphate are commonly employed as positive and negative charge inducers in the membrane bilayers of proniosomal vesicles.⁴⁴,⁴⁵.


Pharmaceutical application of proniosome

Proniosome technology is the effective delivery of a wide range of therapeutic agents through different routes, such as oral, parenteral, dermal, transdermal, ocular, pulmonary, vaginal, and mucosal routes.


Oral route

Administration of the poorly soluble drug through the oral route in the proniosomal form showed increased solubility and bioavailability⁴⁶.



Drugs

Disease treatment

Types of formulation

Major Outcomes

Reference

Celecoxib

Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory drug (NSAID)- COX-2 inhibitor

proniosomal capsule

proniosomal formulation showed enhanced drug dissolution rate than pure drug powder

47

Valsartan

high blood pressure, congestive heart failure, post myocardial infraction and Alzheimer’s disease

proniosome powders

Increased dissolution efficiency and improved Permeation across the rat intestine with proniosome formulation

48

Telmisartan

Angiotensin-II receptor (type AT1) blocker

Tablet

Provides a controlled release profile. The proniosomes might enhance the gastrointestinal absorption of poorly water-soluble drugs 


49

Glipizide

Antidiabetic


sustained the drug release and reduced gastrointestinal irritation

50

Table 2. Research work on proniosome administration through the oral route


Transdermal route

Transdermal drug delivery is a promising alternative to the oral and parenteral route. Proniosomes offer a versatile vesicle delivery concept with the potential for drug delivery via the transdermal route⁵¹.



Drugs

Therapeutic use

Type of formulation

Major Outcomes

Reference

Vinpocetine

cerebrovascular disorder

proniosomal patch

promising carrier for vinpocetine, provides controlled drug release

25

Lacidipine

calcium channel blocker

proniosomal gel

Provided absorption and penetration enhancement of drug formulated transdermally

26

Risperidone

schizophrenia and other psychiatric disorder

transdermal patch

an increase in mean residence time ensures about its prolonged blood circulation

52

Ketorolac

NSAID

proniosomal gel

Maintains extended blood levels of Ketorolac for an extended period

53

Glimepiride

Diabetes

proniosomal gel

Provided controlled release and a significantly higher hypoglycemic activity

54

Frusemide

Diuretic

proniosomal gel

provided controlled systemic transdermal drug delivery

55

Table 3. Research work on proniosome administration through transdermal route


Ophthalmic delivery

Proniosomes offer a promising solution for ocular drug delivery. It improves bioavailability by increasing ocular residence time of drug ⁵⁶,⁵⁷.



Drugs

Therapeutic use

Type of formulation

Major Outcomes

Reference

Voriconazole

fungal keratitis

ocular inserts

prolonged release up to 8 hours

56

Dorzolamide Hydrochloride

anti-glaucoma

proniosomal gel

Sustained drug release and increased bioavailability

57

Levofloxacin

Antibiotic

proniosomal gel

enhanced contact time and retention in the eye and provided sustained release action and better availability of drug

58

Table 4. Research work on proniosome administration through ophthalmic route


Intranasal delivery

Proniosomal gel through the nasal route shows a potential platform for the delivery of drugs to the brain ⁵⁹,⁶⁰.


Drugs

Therapeutic use

Type of formulation

Major Outcomes

Reference

Duloxetine

antidepressant

proniosomal gel

provided improved permeation enhancement and stability with controlled drug release

59

Artemether

cerebral malaria

proniosome powder

better stability and penetration of drug with controlled drug release for a longer duration

60

Table 5. Research work on proniosome administration through intranasal route


Conclusion

Proniosomes represent promising technologies to deliver medications with improved stability in a controlled, targeted manner.

Proniosomal formulations offer improved bioavailability of drugs with poor solubility and reduced adverse effects. A wide range of drugs can be encapsulated in vesicular structures and can be effectively designed for different routes of administration.



Conflicts Of Interest Declaration

Authors report no conflicts of interest.


References


  1. Khatoon M, Shah KU, Din FU, Shah SU, Rehman AU, Dilawar N, Khan AN. Proniosomes derived niosomes: recent advancements in drug delivery and targeting. Drug delivery. 2017; 24(2): 56-69.

  2. Sabale V, Charde M, Dumore N, Mahajan U. Recent Developments in Proniosomal Transdermal Drug Delivery: An Overview. Current Drug Delivery. 2023; 20(6): 683-93.

  3. Hu C, Rhodes DG. Proniosomes: a novel drug carrier preparation. International journal of pharmaceutics. 1999; 185(1): 23-35

  4. Durga B, Veera L. Recent advances of non-ionic surfactant-based nano-vesicles (niosomes and proniosomes): a brief review of these in enhancing transdermal delivery of drug. Future J. Pharm. Sci. 2020;6:100.

  5. Alshora D, Ibrahim M, Alanazi N, Alowyid M, Alnakhli ZA, Alshiban NM, Maodaa S, Alyami NM, Alotaibi I. Formulation of Glibenclamide proniosomes for oral administration: Pharmaceutical and pharmacodynamics evaluation. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal. 2023;31(12):101830.

  6. El-Laithy, H. M., Shoukry, O., & Mahran, L. G. (2011). Novel sugar esters proniosomes for transdermal delivery of vinpocetine: preclinical and clinical studies. European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics 2011;77(1):43-55.

  7. Sabareesh M, Yanadaiah JP, Sekhar KC. A novel vesicular approach for transdermal administration of enalapril maleate loaded nanoproniosomal gel: Formulation, ex vivo evaluation and in vivo antihypertensive study. International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(5):190-202.

  8. Khatoon M, Sohail MF, Shahnaz G, ur Rehman F, ur Rehman A, Ullah N, Amin U, Khan GM, Shah KU. Development and evaluation of optimized thiolated chitosan proniosomal gel containing duloxetine for intranasal delivery. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2019;20:1-2.

  9. Verma P, Prajapati SK, Yadav R, Senyschyn D, Shea PR, Trevaskis NL. Single intravenous dose of novel flurbiprofen-loaded proniosome formulations provides prolonged systemic exposure and anti-inflammatory effect. Molecular pharmaceutics. 2016;13(11):3688-99.

  10. El-Emam GA, El-Baz AM, Shata A, Shaaban AA, El-Sokkary MM, Motawea A. Formulation and microbiological ancillary studies of gemifloxacin proniosomes for exploiting its role against LPS acute pneumonia model. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology. 2023; 81: 104053.

  11. Khatoon M, Shah KU, Din FU, Shah SU, Rehman AU, Dilawar N, Khan AN. Proniosomes derived niosomes: recent advancements in drug delivery and targeting. Drug delivery. 2017; 24(2):56-69.

  12. Govindarajan S, Swamivelmanickam M, Nair SP, Sivagnanam S. A Comprehensive Study on Provesicular Drug Delivery System: Proniosomal Gel. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2022; 84(1).

  13. Kumar GP, Rajeshwarrao P. Nonionic surfactant vesicular systems for effective drug delivery—an overview. Acta pharmaceutica sinica B. 2011;1(4): 208-19.

  14. Ramesh YV, Jawahar N, Jakki SL. Proniosomes: a novel nano vesicular transdermal drug delivery. J Pharm Sci Res. 2013; 5(8): 153-8.

  15. Witika BA, Bassey KE, Demana PH, Siwe-Noundou X, Poka MS. Current advances in specialised niosomal drug delivery: Manufacture, characterization and drug delivery applications. International journal of molecular sciences. 2022; 23(17): 9668

  16. Yadav K, Yadav D, Saroha K, Nanda S, Mathur P, Syan N. Proniosomal Gel: A provesicular approach for transdermal drug delivery. Der Pharmacia Lettre. 2010; 2(4): 189-98.

  17. Rahimpour Y, Kouhsoltani M, Hamishehkar H. Proniosomes in transdermal drug delivery. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2015; 21(20): 2883-91.

  18. Biswal S, Murthy PN, Sahu J, Sahoo P, Amir F. Vesicles of non-ionic surfactants (niosomes) and drug delivery potential. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Nanotechnology (IJPSN). 2008;1(1):1-8.

  19. Abdelbary GA, Amin MM, Zakaria MY. Ocular ketoconazole-loaded proniosomal gels: formulation, ex vivo corneal permeation and in vivo studies. Drug delivery. 2017; 24(1): 309-19.

  20. El-Enin AS, Khalifa MK, Dawaba AM, Dawaba HM. Proniosomal gel-mediated topical delivery of fluconazole: Development: in vitro: characterization, and microbiological evaluation. Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research. 2019; 10(1):20-6

  21. Mokhtar M, Sammour OA, Hammad MA, Megrab NA. Effect of some formulation parameters on flurbiprofen encapsulation and release rates of niosomes prepared from proniosomes. International journal of pharmaceutics. 2008;361(1-2):104-11.

  22. Sandeep G, Devireddy SR. Formulation and evaluation of fluconazole pro-niosomal gel for topical administration. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science. 2014; 4(7): 098-104.

  23. Ammar HO, Ghorab M, El-Nahhas SA, Higazy IM. Proniosomes as a carrier system for transdermal delivery of tenoxicam. International journal of pharmaceutics. 2011; 405(1-2): 142-52.

  24. Mahrous G. Proniosomes as a drug carrier for transdermal delivery of meloxicam. Bulletin of Pharmaceutical Sciences Assiut University. 2010; 33(2):131-40.

  25. El-Laithy HM, Shoukry O, Mahran LG. Novel sugar esters proniosomes for transdermal delivery of vinpocetine: preclinical and clinical studies. European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics. 2011; 77(1): 43-55.

  26. Soliman SM, Abdelmalak NS, El-Gazayerly ON, Abdelaziz N. Novel non-ionic surfactant proniosomes for transdermal delivery of lacidipine: optimization using 23 factorial design and in vivo evaluation in rabbits. Drug delivery. 2016; 23(5):1608-22.

  27. Aboali FA, Habib DA, Elbedaiwy HM, Farid RM. Curcumin-loaded proniosomal gel as a biofreindly alternative for treatment of ocular inflammation: In-vitro and in-vivo assessment. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2020 ;589:119835.

  28. Li Q, Li Z, Zeng W, Ge S, Lu H, Wu C, Ge L, Liang D, Xu Y. Proniosome-derived niosomes for tacrolimus topical ocular delivery: in vitro cornea permeation, ocular irritation, and in vivo anti-allograft rejection. European journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2014; 62: 115-23.

  29. YAPAR EA, Özge IN, TANRIVERDI ST, Sinem YK. Transdermal delivery of meloxicam proniosomes from hydrogels. Latin American Journal of Pharmacy. 2014; 33(3): 476-82.

  30. Kumar S, Jain PK, Pandey N, Saxena G. Comparative study of proniosomal drug delivery system of flurbiprofen. J Chem Pharm Res. 2016;8(5):222-8.

  31. Aboelwafa AA, El-Setouhy DA, Elmeshad AN. Comparative study on the effects of some polyoxyethylene alkyl ether and sorbitan fatty acid ester surfactants on the performance of transdermal carvedilol proniosomal gel using experimental design. AAPS pharmscitech. 2010; 11: 1591-602.

  32. Hu C, Rhodes DG. Proniosomes: a novel drug carrier preparation. International journal of pharmaceutics. 1999; 185(1): 23-35.

  33. Manosroi A, Wongtrakul P, Manosroi J, Sakai H, Sugawara F, Yuasa M, Abe M. Characterization of vesicles prepared with various non-ionic surfactants mixed with cholesterol. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2003;30(1-2):129-38.

  34. Emad Eldeeb A, Salah S, Ghorab M. Proniosomal gel-derived niosomes: an approach to sustain and improve the ocular delivery of brimonidine tartrate; formulation, in-vitro characterization, and in-vivo pharmacodynamic study. Drug delivery. 2019; 26(1): 509-21.

  35. Rawat AS, Kumar MS, Khurana B, Mahadevan N. Proniosome gel: a novel topical delivery system. Int J Rec Adv Pharm Res. 2011;3(1):1-0.

  36. Gupta A, Prajapati SK, Balamurugan M, Singh M, Bhatia D. Design and development of a proniosomal transdermal drug delivery system for captopril. Tropical journal of pharmaceutical research. 2007; 6(2): 687-93.

  37. Vora B, Khopade AJ, Jain NK. Proniosome based transdermal delivery of levonorgestrel for effective contraception. Journal of controlled release. 1998; 54(2): 149-65.

  38. Varsha VR, Savitha SK. Proniosomes: As a potential drug delivery system. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2019; 11(7): 2594-7.

  39. Mittal S, Chaudhary A, Chaudhary A, Kumar A. Proniosomes: the effective and efficient drug-carrier system. Therapeutic delivery. 2020; 11(2): 125-37.

  40. Alshora D, Ibrahim M, Alanazi N, Alowyid M, Alnakhli ZA, Alshiban NM, Maodaa S, Alyami NM, Alotaibi I. Formulation of Glibenclamide proniosomes for oral administration: Pharmaceutical and pharmacodynamics evaluation. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal. 2023; 31(12): 101830.

  41. Akhilesh D, Faishal G, Kamath JV. Comparative study of carriers used in proniosomes. Int J Pharm Chem Sci. 2012;3:6-12.

  42. Sankar V, Ruckmani K, Durga S, Jailani S. Proniosomes as drug carriers. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2010; 23(1): 103-7.

  43. Mokhtar M, Sammour OA, Hammad MA, Megrab NA. Effect of some formulation parameters on flurbiprofen encapsulation and release rates of niosomes prepared from proniosomes. International journal of pharmaceutics. 2008; 361(1-2): 104-11.

  44. Hu C, Rhodes DG. Proniosomes: a novel drug carrier preparation. International journal of pharmaceutics. 1999;185(1): 23-35.

  45. Aburahma MH, Abdelbary GA. Novel diphenyl dimethyl bicarboxylate provesicular powders with enhanced hepatocurative activity: preparation, optimization, in vitro/in vivo evaluation. International journal of pharmaceutics. 2012; 422(1-2): 139-50.

  46. Song S, Tian B, Chen F, Zhang W, Pan Y, Zhang Q, Yang X, Pan W. Potentials of proniosomes for improving the oral bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs. Drug development and industrial pharmacy. 2015; 41(1): 51-62.

  47. Nasr M. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of proniosomes containing celecoxib for oral administration. Aaps Pharmscitech. 2010; 11: 85-9.

  48. Gurrapu A, Jukanti R, Bobbala SR, Kanuganti S, Jeevana JB. Improved oral delivery of valsartan from maltodextrin based proniosome powders. Advanced powder technology. 2012; 23(5): 583-90.

  49. Teaima MH, Yasser M, El-Nabarawi MA, Helal DA. Proniosomal telmisartan tablets: formulation, in vitro evaluation and in vivo comparative pharmacokinetic study in rabbits. Drug design, development and therapy. 2020:1319-31.

  50. Akhilesh D, Faishal G, Prabhu P, Kamath J. Development and Optimization of Proniosomes for Oral delivery of Glipizide. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2012;4(3):307-14.

  51. Ammar HO, Ghorab M, El-Nahhas SA, Higazy IM. Proniosomes as a carrier system for transdermal delivery of tenoxicam. International journal of pharmaceutics. 2011; 405(1-2): 142-52

  52. Sambhakar S, Paliwal S, Sharma S, Singh B. Formulation of risperidone loaded proniosomes for effective transdermal delivery: An in-vitro and in-vivo study. Bulletin of faculty of pharmacy, Cairo University. 2017; 55(2): 239-47.

  53. Alsarra IA, Bosela AA, Ahmed SM, Mahrous GM. Proniosomes as a drug carrier for transdermal delivery of ketorolac. European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics. 2005; 59(3): 485-90.

  54. Abdallah MH, Sabry SA, Hasan AA. Enhancing transdermal delivery of glimepiride via entrapment in proniosomal gel. Journal of Young Pharmacists. 2016;8(4):335.

  55. Azeem A, Jain N, Iqbal Z, Ahmad FJ, Aqil M, Talegaonkar S. Feasibility of proniosomes-based transdermal delivery of frusemide: formulation optimization and pharmacotechnical evaluation. Pharmaceutical development and technology. 2008; 13(2): 155-63.

  56. El-Emam GA, Girgis GN, El-Sokkary MM, El-Azeem Soliman OA, Abd El Gawad AE. Ocular inserts of voriconazole-loaded proniosomal gels: formulation, evaluation and microbiological studies. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2020: 7825-40.

  57. Fouda NH, Abdelrehim RT, Hegazy DA, Habib BA. Sustained ocular delivery of Dorzolamide-HCl via proniosomal gel formulation: in-vitro characterization, statistical optimization, and in-vivo pharmacodynamic evaluation in rabbits. Drug delivery. 2018; 25(1): 1340-9.

  58. Dhangar R, Bhowmick M, Parihar SS, Upmanyu N, Dubey B. Design and evaluation of proniosomes as drug carrier for ocular delivery of levofloxacin. Journal of drug delivery and therapeutics. 2014; 4(5): 182-9.

  59. Khatoon M, Sohail MF, Shahnaz G, ur Rehman F, ur Rehman A, Ullah N, Amin U, Khan GM, Shah KU. Development and evaluation of optimized thiolated chitosan proniosomal gel containing duloxetine for intranasal delivery. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2019; 20:1-2.

  60. Uddin N, Solunke RS, Trivedi SJ, Bayas J. A Proniosomal Drug Delivery System for Targeting the Brain: Design, Development, and Formulation.African journal of biological sciences. 2024; 6(13): 766-773.


Author Information


Authors:

Authors: Jayashree B. Gaja¹, Dr. Panner Selvam R.²


01. Research Scholar

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, PES University,

02. Dr. Panner Selvam R.

Associate Professor

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, PES University, PESU ECC Main Rd, Konappana Agrahara, Electronic City, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560100.

E-Mail address: pannerselvam@pes.edu


Corresponding Author:

Jayashree B. Gaja, Research Scholar, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, PES University

Address: Postal Address: PESU ECC Main Rd, Konappana Agrahara, Electronic City, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560100.

Telephone: 09923550895




Comments


bottom of page